ANULUM / SCPN Reactor Systems / Magneto-inertial and magnetised-target systems / MagLIF

MagLIF — magnetised liner inertial fusion

Three stages define the class: axial premagnetisation of the fuel, laser preheat of the fuel column, and a pulsed-power implosion of the conducting cylindrical liner that compresses fuel and flux together. SCPN-MIF-MAGLIF-CORE owns the device truth of the maglif configuration.

What the configuration is

A MagLIF target is a small metal cylinder — the liner — filled with fusion fuel. Before the shot, a coil pair puts an axial magnetic field through the fuel. A laser then heats the fuel column through a window at one end. Finally a very large axial current flows through the liner; the azimuthal field of that current drives the liner inward at tens of kilometres per second, and because the liner is a good conductor it carries the axial flux with it. The fuel is compressed and heated adiabatically; the compressed field slows heat conduction out of it. The preheat matters because the compression starts from a warmer column and needs a smaller convergence to reach a given temperature.

The instability that limits the scheme is magneto-Rayleigh–Taylor at the accelerating liner surface; the core carries it as a budget declaration, and the growth rate itself lives in SCPN-Fusion-Core.

What the core owns

What it explicitly excludes

Level-0 physics and its anchor

The core evaluates the three stages mechanically — the azimuthal field \(\mu_0 I/2\pi r\) at the liner surface and its magnetic pressure, the liner mass and implosion kinetic energy at a declared velocity, the preheat energy per unit fuel volume — and the stagnation limits by axial flux conservation \(B_z C^2\) and adiabatic compression \(C^{2(\gamma-1)}\), both recorded as upper bounds.

Anchored on printed values. The filed chapter SAND2021-3239B prints a liner 10 mm tall, 5 mm in outer diameter and 0.5 mm in wall, and a first integrated experiment with a 10 T axial field, 0.5 kJ of deposited preheat and 18 MA of peak load current. The aspect ratio those two liner numbers give is exactly 5.0. The peak implosion velocity is printed as a range, 70 to 100 km/s, and a value is declared from inside it. Declared, and said to be declared: the liner material density (beryllium, 1850 kg/m³), the convergence ratio and the adiabatic index. The filed source is a related public chapter; the cited Phys. Plasmas 17 (2010) 056303 is behind a subscription and is not on file, and nothing implies it was read.

Load this design point in the explorer →

Non-claims

Capabilities and evidence

Evidence maturity computational_prototype, five implemented capabilities, each with its evidence record in VALIDATION.md: the device configuration model (validated parameter objects with documented consistency estimates, canonical serialisation, a data-only SPO registry pin); the diagnostic and clock semantics model (synthetic channel and clock declarations aligned fail-closed with the pinned SPO observability catalogue); level-0 device physics (the closed forms on this page); the device 3D model and the device CAD model (one body per stage of the drive, tessellated on the shared kernel library and built again as exact solids). No parameter set or channel describes any real machine or diagnostic; the claim inventory is empty and verified by the domain validator.

Repository · VALIDATION.md · ARCHITECTURE.md · ADRs